Showing posts with label unemployment. Show all posts
Showing posts with label unemployment. Show all posts

Monday, May 29, 2023

India: Too few jobs, too many workers and ‘no plan B’ | Tara Subramaniam and Sania Farooqui (CNN)

cnn

Too few jobs, too many workers and ‘no plan B’: The time bomb hidden in India’s ‘economic miracle’

India gains global new title as China's population declines
02:34 - Source: CNN
New Delhi CNN  — 

Sunil Kumar knows all about working hard to achieve a dream. The 28-year-old from India’s Haryana state already has two degrees – a bachelor’s and a master’s – and is working on a third, all with a view to landing a well-paid job in one of the world’s fastest growing economies.

“I studied so that I can be successful in life,” he said. “When you work hard, you should be able to get a job.”

Kumar does now have a job, but it’s not the one he studied for – and definitely not the one he dreamed about.

He has spent the past five years sweeping the floors of a school in his village, a full-time job he supplements with a less lucrative side hustle tutoring younger students. All told, he makes about $85 a month.

It’s not much, he concedes, especially as he needs to support two aging parents and a sister, but it is all he has. Ideally, he says, he’d work as a teacher and put his degrees to use. Instead, “I have to do manual labor just to be able to feed myself.”

Kumar’s situation is not unusual, but a predicament faced by millions of other young Indians. Youth unemployment in the country is climbing sharply, a development that risks undermining the new darling of the world economy at the very moment it was expected to really take off.

Advertisement

India’s newfound status as the world’s most populous nation had prompted hopes of a youthful new engine for the global economy just as China’s population begins to dwindle and age. Unlike China’s, India’s working age population is young, growing, and projected to hit a billion over the next decade – a vast pool of labor and consumption that one Biden administration official has called an “economic miracle.”

But for young Indians like Kumar, there’s a flip side to this so-called miracle: too few jobs and too much competition.

Sunil Kumar, 28, is frustrated about what he sees as a lack of opportunities.

From ‘miracle’ to disillusion

In contrast to China, where economists fear there won’t be enough workers to support the growing number of elderly, in India the concern is there aren’t enough jobs to support the growing number of workers.

While people under the age of 25 account for more than 40% of India’s population, almost half of them – 45.8% – were unemployed as of December 2022, according to the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE), an independent think tank headquartered in Mumbai, which publishes job data more regularly than the Indian government.

Some analysts have described the situation to CNN as a “time bomb”, warning of the potential for social unrest unless more employment can be created.

Kumar, like others in his position, knows all too well the frustrations that can build when work is scarce.

“I get very angry that I don’t have a successful job despite my qualifications and education,” he said. “I blame the government for this. It should give work to its people.”

The bad news for people like Kumar, and the Indian government, is that experts warn the problem will only get worse as the population grows and competition for jobs gets even tougher.

Kaushik Basu, an economics professor at Cornell University and former chief economic adviser for the Indian government, described India’s youth unemployment rate as “shockingly high.”

It’s been “climbing slowly for a long time, say for about 15 years it’s been on a slow climb but over the past seven, eight years it’s been a sharp climb,” he said.

“If that category of people do not find enough employment,” Basu added, “then what was meant to be an opportunity, the bulge in that demographic dividend, could become a huge challenge and problem for India.”

‘There’s competition everywhere’

To be clear, it’s not all doom and gloom.

Economists say India has various options to address these demographic problems – among them, developing an already globally competitive and labor-intensive manufacturing sector, which accounted for less than 15% of employment in 2021, according to Capital Economics, a relatively low amount.

But such fixes on the macro level will do little to help those who are struggling now. Students like high-schooler Megha Kumari, who must take ever more extreme measures to get an edge on the competition.

Kumari, 17, has left her hometown of Dumka, in the eastern state of Jharkhand, to study at the Vibrant Academy in Kota, a city in the northern state of Rajasthan – more than 800 miles (1,300 kilometers) away.

The academy is one of several such centers across India where students hoping to qualify for top-tier colleges go to augment the regular high school curriculum with extra exam prep courses and tutoring sessions.

Kumari sees it as her best chance of realizing her dream of becoming a professor, but it comes at great cost, financially and personally.

In a country where the average salary for regular full-time workers is around $225 per month, according to the most recent government figures, tuition fees for one year at the academy range from around $145 to $1,872.

Kumari said she also keenly misses the support her family used to provide.

“The environment is actually really competitive,” Kumari said. “Living alone and away from family and going through all that stress is hard for a student.”

Her situation, too, is not unusual.

“Since childhood, we’ve been facing this competition,” said Sarang Agrawal, 28, who is studying for the Indian civil service entrance test.

“In India, there’s competition in every exam. There’s competition everywhere.”

Sarang Agrawal (center) is studying in the hope of becoming a civil servant.

No social life, no love life … and no plan B

Like Kumar and Kumari, Agrawal knows all about competition. He is among the more than 1 million people who apply each year for a position in the Indian civil service.

It’s one of the country’s most highly sought-after jobs and, with less than 1% of applicants making the cut, a whole industry has grown up around helping people get their hands on what they see as a golden ticket.

“As the population has increased, the competition has increased, so people’s chances have reduced,” said Madhusudan, who goes by only one name and is the director of content and strategy at Study IQ, a tuition center specializing in helping people study for the civil service entrance exam.

India’s youth, he says, are feeling the pressure.

“You can see the stress level is very high these days among the students. Students come to me and say ‘Sir, I’m not able to sleep,’” Madhusudan said.

There’s precious little time for anything to defuse the tension – “No social life, no love life,” as Agrawal put it, “but at least we have a goal.”

Still, in this most competitive of markets, even the most driven are tested to their limits.

Agrawal has taken the civil service exam four times without success. Continuing with his dream is costing his family dearly, to the tune of around $3,000 a year when tuition fees, food and housing are taken into account.

“They could have bought three to four cars with the money they spent on me,” said Agrawal, who feels he has no other option but to keep trying.

“There’s no such Plan B,” he said.

 

Tuesday, January 10, 2023

India: Increasing unemployment is a major cause for concern | Santosh Mehrotra

 scroll.in

Demographic dividend

How India’s rulers have dashed the hopes of its younger citizens

Increasing unemployment is a major cause for concern.

Politicians constantly talk about India being a young country, since two-thirds of the population is under 35 years of age and half of it below 26. Some economists consider this an automatic boon for the economy, since there is a limitless number of workers who could contribute to India’s productive capacity.

Finance and investment giant Morgan Stanley, in a report released in November, identified this productive potential as the reason for “this decade being India’s decade”. But its projections may be too optimistic.

Advertisement

Not much cause for optimism is offered by the four engines of growth – private final consumption expenditure, private investment, government expenditure and net exports.

Nearly 58% of India’s gross domestic product, or GDP, is accounted for by private final consumption expenditure on individual needs. However, since demonetisation in November 2016 – when Rs 500 and Rs 1,000 currency notes were declared invalid – consumption expenditure has been tepid, as job growth fell sharply.

No wonder that in 2017-’18, when the Union government released the Periodic Labour Force Survey data, unemployment had reached a 45-year high of 6.1%. In 2012, it was only 2.1%.

In fact, the growth of non-farm jobs fell to 2.9 million per year between 2013 and 2019, a dramatic drop at a time when five to six million new young people were looking for work each year. By contrast, 7.5 million non-farm jobs were being created each year between 2004-’05 and 2011-’12, according to data from the National Statistics Office.

Private final consumption expenditure per capita depends mainly on the prevailing employment situation and expectations of jobs in the future. In 2021-’22, it had dropped to 5% below 2019-’20 levels,

Like consumption, private investment, which is the second-most important driver of economic growth after private final consumption, also depends significantly on expectations of consumption growth at the present moment and in the future.

Total investment inherited by the current government was 31.3% of the GDP in 2013-’14, according to the finance ministry’s economic survey 2018-’19. It fell to 29% of the GDP in 2018-’19 and 28.2% in 2019-20 before the outbreak of the Covid-19 pandemic.

It decreased further during the pandemic: in nominal terms, it was 27.1% in 2020-’21 and 29.6% in 2021-’22 as share in GDP (higher in the financial year 2022 only because there was a rebound after pandemic contraction on a practically stagnant GDP over the preceding three years taken cumulatively).

The Covid-19 years also saw a fall in capacity utilisation, which Investopedia explains is the measure of the potential output of a company that is actually being realised. In India, capacity utilisation in the manufacturing sector had been running just below 70% before Covid-19 and fell to 60% in July 2021.

Although it has been gradually climbing since then, it still stands at 74% – not sufficient to encourage private firms to initiate new investment (or new hiring on the scale required to absorb the newly minted jobseekers).

Most non-farm jobs in India are generated by Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, or MSMEs, but expectations for this sector are even lower. MSMEs took a heavy beating from demonetisation, as most of their working capital is in the form of cash. With 86% of the currency declared invalid overnight in November 2016, thousands of MSMEs simply closed down, never to reopen. It set in motion the fall in growth for nine quarters all the way to the start of the pandemic lockdown on March 25, 2020.

Expectations about future consumption demand can be gauged from Figure 1 and two other factors. The first is open unemployment, when an educated person seeks work but is unable to find it. Figure 1 shows that consumption demand from a youthful population is likely to remain tepid.

Credit: Author's estimate based on data from the National Statistical Office, Periodic Labour Force Survey and other datasets. According to the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, UPSS – a measure of employment – refers to Usual Principal Status and Subsidiary Status, which considers a person as employed if they have engaged in an economy activity for 30 days or more in the preceding 365 days.

In addition, open unemployment among India’s youth (15-29 years of age) has shot up. Overall, it increased to 16% in 2019 from 6% in 2012. Second, the higher the education level, the higher the unemployment level. About 80% of India’s 15-16-year-olds have received secondary education, but their unemployment rate is 10%. For graduates, it was 20% in 2012, but has increased to over 30% before Covid-19. Postgraduates fared worse, with their unemployment level doubling.

Advertisement

It does not appear that formal or vocational education or training helped much either, despite the government’s much-vaunted Skill India initiative. Technical training also provides little guarantee of a job. Unemployment increased from 18% to 28% for those with technical education below graduate level and from 20% to 35% if technical education was till graduate or a higher level.

Another reason why future consumption demand is likely to remain tepid is that the share of the working-age population that has jobs has fallen consistently from 2016 to 2022. The employment rate fell to 36% in 2022 from 43% in 2016. This was a 7% fall in the employment rate in a country that has the largest young population in the world.

This employment rate is much lower than the world average of about 60%. With the employment rate falling, the number of “discouraged workers” – those not even looking for employment – keeps growing.

The third reason why consumption has been low, and is likely to remain low, is that the wages of those employed have remained stagnant for casual/regular wage workers. For the self-employed, earnings have fallen from Rs 429 to Rs 411 per person per day from 2017-’18 to 2020 (as estimated from the employment data of the National Statistics Office).

Under such circumstances, the optimistic scenario put forth by analysts such as Morgan Stanley that “India’s GDP could more than double from $3.5 trillion today to surpass $7.5 trillion by 2031”, appear unfounded.

India’s current GDP is $3.2 trillion, not $3.5 trillion. If it is to even double to $6.4 trillion, it requires a growth rate of 8.75% per year from 2022-’23 to 2031-’32.

India has not achieved such growth in the past eight years. In fact, in the last three years (2019-’20, 2020-’21, 2021-’22) the average growth rate has been 2.5%, far short of the 7% that the country considers to be its growth potential.

“Measured relative to 2019, GDP today is just 7.6 percent larger, compared with 13.1 percent in China and 4.6 percent in the slow-growing United States,” noted former Chief Economic Advisor Arvind Subramanian and former International Monetary Fund official Josh Felman in an article for Foreign Affairs in December.

Advertisement

What are the prospects for the remaining two drivers of growth – exports and government expenditure – to provide an impetus for aggregate demand? Aggregate demand refers to the demand for finished goods and services produced in an economy, according to Investopedia.

While services exports have remained buoyant through the pandemic, merchandise exports have not. The current government inherited sustained export growth from 1992 to 2014, at roughly 18% per annum. The share of exports rose from under 10% of the GDP to 25% by 2008, and even after falling slightly in the wake of the global economic crisis of 2008, it recovered.

In 2013-’14, merchandise exports stood at $318 billion. It fell thereafter and remained below that level for five full years, before recovering for over a year, but then decreased again recently to around $400 billion before falling again. The Russia-Ukraine war and an impending recession in advanced countries bodes ill for India’s exports.

Finally, there will be limits in the forthcoming budget on the government raising public spending, including for capital expenditure (which could crowd in private investment), as public debt-to-GDP rose from 65% to 90% of the GDP during Covid-19, before falling somewhat to 85% (as the Central Statistics Office estimates). The imperative to contain the fiscal deficit at 10% of the GDP remains overwhelming.

Advertisement

Santosh Mehrotra is Professorial Senior Fellow, Nehru Memorial Museum and Library, New Delhi.

Will this be India’s decade? Experts around the world are debating the economy’s rise

... thank you for making Scroll.in the digital-only news organisation with the widest reach in India.

We request you to support our award-winning journalism by making a financial contribution towards the Scroll Ground Reporting Fund. The fund will ensure we can continue to ask the questions that need to be asked, investigate what needs to be uncovered, document what must not go unrecorded.

 

Tuesday, August 30, 2022

India's Low Youth Employment Rate | Mahesh Vyas (Business Standard, August 29, 2022)

 

https://www.business-standard.com/article/opinion/india-s-low-youth-employment-rate-122082900897_1.html

Business Standard,

Thursday, July 7, 2022

India: Labour reforms will hurt employment | R Karumalaiyan (Jul 06, 2022 )

 Business Line

Opinion

Labour reforms will hurt employment

R Karumalaiyan | Updated on: Jul 06, 2022 
 
Labour laws’ deregulation has worsened labour productivity and incomes, thereby hurting economic growth
Labour Minister Bhupender Yadav, in the article ‘Labour reforms and the rise of jobs’ ( BusinessLine, June 24), argues that “India’s labour regulatory framework has been rigid and hindered the growth of output, investment and employment expansion”. He buttressed his arguments with the reports of four big employer associations — Assocham, CII, FICCI and PHDCCI — along with a study of VV Giri National Labour Institute.
He then cites the labour reform undertaken by the BJP government in Rajasthan in 2014-15 and how that has paid off. Before getting into the debate on labour reform vis-a-vis the growth stories that have repeatedly been dished out since the 1990s when the LPG (liberalisation, privatisation and globalisation) policies were first rolled out in India, it would be relevant to assess the current unemployment scene. The Minister has portrayed a rosy picture, whereas the reality is alarming.
Thirty-one years after that watershed moment in India’s socio-economic history, the country is battling acute unemployment and job losses.
Informal sector jobs
In a 2019 report, data analysts at IndiaSpend reveal that the country had not created adequate jobs since liberalisation, and 92 per cent of jobs created were in the informal sector.
Thus the unemployment situation has been alarming even before the huge dislocation unleashed by the unplanned lockdowns imposed in 2020-21 in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. Much before the pandemic, the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) reported a 6.1 per cent unemployment rate in 2017-18, the worst in over four decades. The picture has become more dismal in the ensuing months since April-May of 2020.
For instance, in December 2021, the Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy (CMIE) estimated that nearly 53 million Indians were unemployed, a large proportion of whom were women. The unemployment rate was hovering at 7.91 per cent in December 2021.
The recent agitations by the youth against the Agnipath scheme are a reflection of the gravity of the situation. Recently, the Railway Recruitment Board received 1.25 crore applications for a mere 35,000 posts. Many a time a few government jobs, that too at the bottom level, have attracted thousands of applications.
Clamour for govt jobs
Why is there this scramble for government jobs? Labour historian Prof Maya John says it stems from the fact that bulk of the jobs in the private sector is characterised by high job insecurity (easy hire and fire), poor basic pay, and long hours of work. Historically, only a small number of employer-employee work relations — associated mostly with the formal sector — have been subject to state regulation. However, in recent decades, there has been a steady decline of even that.
This deregulation has been coupled with a concerted push towards rapid privatisation of the public sector.
Together, these developments have contributed significantly to periodic and permanent mass unemployment among both skilled and less skilled workers.
In addition, avenues of gainful employment for new entrants in the job market have fallen drastically.
Contrary to the Minister’s claims, the VV Giri National Labour Institute study (No 122/2017), led by Sanjay Upadhyaya and Pankaj Kumar, did not find any evidence that previous labour law reforms initiated in Rajasthan and other States had succeeded in attracting investment and boosting investment leave alone create jobs.
Rather it had concluded that that “so far as expected outcome/impact is concerned from the effected amendments in these States… the strains on labour are already clearly visible which warrant attention to ameliorate and to offset the resultant hardships and uncertainty faced by the workers at least in the interim period.”
Rajasthan’s labour reforms
As the Minister has referred to the Rajasthan experiments in labour law deregulation as the most ideal, it would be in order to cite a more recent research on this. The Azim Premji University’s Centre for Sustainable Employment has done an exclusive study on the Rajasthan experiments under the title ‘Labour Reforms in the Indian State of Rajasthan; a boon or a bane?’, by Diti Goswami and Sourabh Paul and published as the CSE Working Paper in January 2021.
In this paper, the authors conclude thus: “Our empirical analysis shows the reforms to have an unintended consequence of the decline in labour use... The implications regarding employment are similar to those presented by D’Souza (2010); Kapoor (2014); Chandru (2014); Chatterjee and Kanbur (2015); Deakin and Haldar (2015); Roychowdhury (2019); Roy, Dubey and Ramaiah (2020) in the sense that higher flexibility (of labour laws) is associated with weaker employment growth. Also, worryingly, the increased flexibility results in a disproportionate reduction in the directly employed workers. Heyes and Lewis (2015) and Avdagic (2015) find similar results for the European Union.”
Importance of human capital
According to the ‘Ease of Doing Business’ study published by the World Bank in 2014, only a little over one-tenth of the respondent firms in India had perceived labour regulations as a major constraint (World Bank Group 2014).
Research by Kucera (2002) showed that core labour standards of the ILO produce better human capital (that is, the elimination of child and bonded workers), greater efficiency through the labour cost-productivity nexus, and more social and political stability via freedom of association and collective bargaining. Freeman and Medoff (1991) have argued that trade unions contribute to the productive efficiency of a firm through voice channels and also contribute to equitable outcomes in them.
Hence, to accelerate growth and provide jobs to all the aspirants in the labour market and, thereby, reap the huge demographic dividend, there’s a need to get rid of pro-corporate, both domestic and foreign, policies. Economic growth and employment have nothing to do with labour reform. They are more specifically related to demand constraints, which entail more redistributive measures.
Thus, the implementation of the labour codes and rules has no potential to accelerate India’s journey to lead the world’s strongest economies; rather, it would lead to the enslavement of our workers, besides aggravating the choking of consumption and contributing further to the slump in the job-market as well as employment generating investment. India has achieved higher rate of growth before 2014 without any drastic deregulation in the name of labour law codification.
The writer is National Secretary, CITU
Published on July 06, 2022 

Wednesday, February 9, 2022

India: Berozgai ka sach sunogay [the truth of unemployment in India] Short video in Hindi

Berozgari ki maar ka Sach Sunogey - बेरोज़गारी की मार का सच सुनोगे

 https://youtu.be/3jw7mTk-Sx8

Monday, January 31, 2022

India’s Job Crisis Much Severe Than it Seems | Neelu Vyas (Jan 31, 2022, Newsclick)

 

India’s Job Crisis Much Severe Than it Seems

The simple fact is that aspiring students are looking for government jobs, but these have declined due to increased privatisation, digitisation and automation.

The recent student protests across Bihar and Uttar Pradesh over Railway Recruitment Board exams are a symptom of the burgeoning job crisis in India, which is more severe than it looks. It cannot be seen in isolation as a Bihar or UP phenomenon. Yet, these two states offer a textbook example of how things are going wrong with government services and the various recruitment boards, leading to anger amongst the youths. What is most surprising is the indifference of the government to resolve and address the issue.

Let's understand where the fundamental problem lies. Take Bihar as an example, and you can better comprehend why there is an acute job crisis. There are some stark and glaring statistics -- 1.25 core aspirants had applied for over 35,000 posts advertised by RRB for the Group C services. Rough estimates by the state government show that the maximum number of applicants is from UP and Bihar. What explains this craze for the Railways?

Industry is scarce in Bihar, and as a result, there are no private jobs, so what will the educated young men do for a living? Naturally, they run toward government jobs as it guarantees them job security and decent pay. On average, nearly 20 lakh youngsters annually apply for Railways, banks and other government jobs -- such is the level of unemployment in Bihar.

Railways and banks are among the country's most prominent public sector job providers, drawing many from Bihar. Salary for Group D to Group A in the Railways ranges from Rs 17,000 per month to Rs 50,000 per month for freshers, and the amount goes up as they grow in their careers. Imagine someone earning Rs 4,000 a month doing odd jobs can make more than Rs 17,000 just by doing a Group D job in the Railways. This is why we saw mayhem on the streets of Bihar and UP.

There are nearly 1.25 crore people between the ages of 18-23 years in Bihar, who should be going to college, but 50 lakh out of those would be class 10 pass, nearly 35 lakh would be class 12 pass and only 25 lakh or so will be graduates. A vast number of school dropouts also make up a large chunk of unemployed youth, and those who are educated have just one way to get employment — government jobs.

The simple fact is that these aspiring students look for government jobs, but the number of sarkari naukris has declined due to increased privatisation, digitisation and automation. The Union Public Service Commission or UPSC, which offers elitist jobs, has seen its vacancies dwindle. According to a reply given by the government in Lok Sabha last year, there is a dip of almost 30% in UPSC jobs. I spoke to a DoPT (department of personnel & training) official, who said on the condition of anonymity, that a significant factor in deciding any recruitment or vacancies is cadre management. The government has to keep in mind the career progression of its recruits, and that's why there is a downward trend.

Apart from UPSC, there are several other recruitment boards. The case of the Staff Selection Commissionor SSC is worse. There were 20,000 vacancies in SSC in 2013, which declined to 12,000 in 2018 and there are currently 8,000-9000 vacancies only. Shady administrative processes, lack of honesty in conducting exams, and the government's inability to create jobs have led to the students raising their voices. Irregularities in the RRB NTPC exams are just the tip of the iceberg.

A committee has been constituted to examine the concerns of the students who appeared for the RRB NTPC exams, but the government already knows the problem. Formation of a committee just before the Assembly elections is a time-buying tactic to avert the crisis. Is the government really serious about addressing the problems of lakhs of students? Perhaps, no. Had it been serious, there would have been a time-bound process that could have been easily followed.

The latest Centre for Monitoring Indian Economy data shows that the unemployment rate has crept up to 8%, which clearly illustrates that the government has been unable to create jobs. Coupled with this process is the downsizing of vacancies. Seemingly, it's a volcano waiting to erupt in the form of a nationwide movement, and if it does, it could be the biggest thorn in the flesh of the Narendra Modi government.

 

[source URL: https://www.newsclick.in/India-Job-Crisis-Much-Severe-Than-Seems ]

The writer is a Delhi-based freelance journalist. Views are personal.

Monday, April 6, 2020

India: About 50 million people might have lost jobs in just two weeks of the lockdown


See also: https://www.livemint.com/news/india/covid-19-lockdown-impact-unemployment-rate-rises-to-23-4-11586202041180.html